My Heart Rate

read only section for reference and search purposes.
Locked
[old] tap
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

Training

Post by [old] tap » January 26th, 2006, 10:01 pm

Up to Wednesday I assumed that my maximum heart rate was 177. I had rowed hard numerous times in the past and my heart rate never went above 177. Wednesday I did a 2K row where I attempted to sprint the last 300 meters. Shortly after I began to sprint my heart rate moved to 187 and remained there until I completed my row. Is this normal? It seems as if my heart just grew 10 years younger. Being 40 years old this MHR surprised me.<br /><br />Ultimately, my question deals with the training bands. Is it now appropriate to revise mine based on a MHR of 187 instead of 177?<br /><br />I have performed four 2K rows as noted below which show my heart rate over time.<br /><br /><!--c1--><table width='95%' cellspacing='1' cellpadding='3' border='0' align='center'><tr><td><b><div class='genmed'>CODE</div></b></td></tr><tr><td class='code'><div><!--ec1-->Date            Time    Meters    SPM    HR    /500m<br /><br />1/25/2006    07:20.6                           01:50.1<br />1/25/2006                500      27    163    01:50.0<br />1/25/2006               1000      28    166    01:53.2<br />1/25/2006               1500      27    169    01:53.9<br />1/25/2006               2000      31    187    01:43.5<br /><br />1/16/2006    07:28.2                           01:52.0<br />1/16/2006                500      33    169    01:43.3<br />1/16/2006               1000      27    157    01:59.7<br />1/16/2006               1500      27    162    01:56.5<br />1/16/2006               2000      29    177    01:48.8<br /><br />6/15/2005    07:27.8                           01:51.9<br />6/15/2005                500      33    161    01:46.5<br />6/15/2005               1000      31    166    01:53.6<br />6/15/2005               1500      30    169    01:54.5<br />6/15/2005               2000      31    175    01:53.3<br /><br />4/16/2005    08:11.0                           02:02.7<br />4/16/2005                500      29    153    02:01.0<br />4/16/2005               1000      29    159    02:00.5<br />4/16/2005               1500      30    159    02:04.0<br />4/16/2005               2000      29    161    02:05.5<!--c2--></div></td></tr></table>

[old] michaelb
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

Training

Post by [old] michaelb » January 26th, 2006, 11:47 pm

I am 40 and my max HR that I have seen on the C2 is 189-192. So I would guess that what you see is normal. Nothing wrong with having the HR of someone in 30s (actually, I don't think max HR really means that much and is individual not really comparable between people). But I think a 2k is a little short to measure your HR max. There are several challenging methods to test your HR. If you just want to use a value from an all out row, the 5k or 6k is a better distance (the above HR max values are from 5ks and 6ks).<br /><br />Have you been rowing since April? You may also be adapting to really be able to work hard on the rowing machine, so getting closer to your real HR max (technique, muscle failure, etc may have been limiting your performance before, not max aerobic capacity). At 7:20 you may find you are at the end of the easy, big gains in your 2k time. 7:10 may prove to be farther away than you think.

[old] jfo
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

Training

Post by [old] jfo » January 27th, 2006, 6:07 am

Hi.<br />I am 40 too. The highest HR I have observed was 191.<br />That was after 15 km's at pretty high speed and increasing<br />in the last 500 meters.<br /><br />Suggest you find your Max by doing similar workout.<br /><br />Good luck

[old] tap
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

Training

Post by [old] tap » January 27th, 2006, 6:39 am

<!--QuoteBegin-michaelb+Jan 26 2006, 10:47 PM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(michaelb @ Jan 26 2006, 10:47 PM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Have you been rowing since April?  ... 7:10 may prove to be farther away than you think.[right] </td></tr></table><br />Thanks for the reply. I received my Concept2 during the last week of March 2005.<br /><br />In June, I used the following approach, from the "Indoor Rowing Training Guide, Version 2", to determine my max heart rate.<br /><!--QuoteBegin--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Start the test by rowing at the split you recorded from the warm up. After every 90 seconds note the heart rate and increase the effort by 25 watts (see 500m Split Time to Watts Conversion in Appendix). Repeat this procedure until you reach exhaustion and record the maximum heart rate achieved. </td></tr></table><br />Just now, while I was searching for the quote, I noticed a note that states that this method is applicable if you have been exercising regularly. Given that I had been a couch potato for the last 20 years that would probably explain why I wasn't hitting my true max heart rate. I'll try the test again soon and see if I can get my heart rate to go higher.<br /><br />I am certain that my row way back in April 2005 was much more challenging than my row this past week. When my heart rate got into the high 150's it became very difficult to breath because my throat seemed to become constricted. This seems to be less of a problem now although I sometimes need to clear my throat fairly often to keep my airway clear.<br /><br />I'll have to do another 2K soon. It's not that I'm getting fatigued during the first 1500 meters as to why I am rowing at the selected rate. I was basing my rate on the training bands so if I can shift the bands then I can hopefully improve my times. It will probably take numerous more 2K rows to get a better idea what my body is really capable of performing.

[old] jfo
Posts: 0
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm

Training

Post by [old] jfo » January 27th, 2006, 9:59 am

<!--QuoteBegin-tap+Jan 27 2006, 12:39 PM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><div class='genmed'><b>QUOTE(tap @ Jan 27 2006, 12:39 PM)</b></div></td></tr><tr><td class='quote'><!--QuoteEBegin-->It's not that I'm getting fatigued during the first 1500 meters as to why I am rowing at the selected rate. I was basing my rate on the training bands </td></tr></table><br /><br />I only consider training bands while doing normal work outs.<br />During test of my 2000 m (every 3 weeks or so) I don't think in those terms.<br />In tests its all about at which rate I can do the 2000m in order to do it in the shortest possible time. <br />

Locked