Better 2k split
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 4
- Joined: May 5th, 2025, 1:27 am
Better 2k split
I'm in my first year of competitive rowing. I'm 5'5 120 pounds and my first 2k being 1:53.6 and my second being 1:53.1. Would it be possible for me to hit a sub 1:50 or even sub 1:48 2k by the end of the summer?
-
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 61
- Joined: January 11th, 2025, 8:55 pm
Re: Better 2k split
For Sure!CharTehDuck wrote: ↑May 5th, 2025, 1:30 amI'm in my first year of competitive rowing. I'm 5'5 120 pounds and my first 2k being 1:53.6 and my second being 1:53.1. Would it be possible for me to hit a sub 1:50 or even sub 1:48 2k by the end of the summer?
I'm 63 years old and have been rowing 5 months. I've gone from 2:05 to what you're aiming for/ 1:50ish during that time frame. I'm an old man... not even close to the recovery ability that you have. The biggest training tip that I've found so far are workouts at UT1 or slightly faster along with r20 cap are VERY productive.
Good Luck
John
Re: Better 2k split
While newbie gains are normally more than this, you have set good times so may not have faults to correct to help, while the usual gains from better pacing, rating and understanding your limits will probably still get you to 1:50 at least with smart and consistent training.
However we do need a bit more info. Notably your age, the time and average strokes per minute for each of the sub-divisions of your 2k, sporting background and sex. Also how much time you have available for erging and any other sports that you will continue.
However we do need a bit more info. Notably your age, the time and average strokes per minute for each of the sub-divisions of your 2k, sporting background and sex. Also how much time you have available for erging and any other sports that you will continue.
56, lightweight in pace and by gravity. Currently training 3-4 times a week after a break to slowly regain the pitiful fitness I achieved a few years ago. Free Spirit, come join us http://www.freespiritsrowing.com/forum/
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 4
- Joined: May 5th, 2025, 1:27 am
Re: Better 2k split
Hi! Thanks a lot! I recently turned 15 in very late February and this is my first year of rowing as a U16. I'm a guy btw. I did cross country for a little bit in middle school I was very active in sports like soccer when I was younger and I play basketball with my dad. I have a lot of time available as I practice 6 times a week for 2 and a half hours each. I'll try to get my 2k sub-divisions from my coxswains as I did it during a practice. I also did my second 2k 2 weeks after my first one so that may explain the little gap between the times.iain wrote: ↑May 5th, 2025, 12:33 pmWhile newbie gains are normally more than this, you have set good times so may not have faults to correct to help, while the usual gains from better pacing, rating and understanding your limits will probably still get you to 1:50 at least with smart and consistent training.
However we do need a bit more info. Notably your age, the time and average strokes per minute for each of the sub-divisions of your 2k, sporting background and sex. Also how much time you have available for erging and any other sports that you will continue.
Re: Better 2k split
15 year olds vary a lot with some people having largely matured at 13 while others are still growing rapidly and have under developed muscles at 17. Excessive training while you are growing rapidly will decrease your performance long term, so while a great 2k this year may sound great, it could come at the cost of any chance of a rowing scholarship at college. So I would not advise anything like that level of training for someone of your size and age. We only get faster when we are resting and if our bodies are growing and maturing then this will detract from the recovery of muscles and so more resting is required to deliver long term gains.CharTehDuck wrote: ↑May 5th, 2025, 4:38 pmI recently turned 15 in very late February and this is my first year of rowing as a U16. I'm a guy btw. I did cross country for a little bit in middle school I was very active in sports like soccer when I was younger and I play basketball with my dad. I have a lot of time available as I practice 6 times a week for 2 and a half hours each.
My own son was asked to perform a counter-productive volume and intensity of training at your age and I had to step in with his coaches when injuries were not being respected and no time was allowed to recover. This lead to increased match performance while some of his team mates were constantly performing below par! You might even find that you can do a 1:50 already with improved pacing and a proper taper beforehand. HOw do your sessions breakdown and what proportion of each is done at moderately hard intensity or above?
56, lightweight in pace and by gravity. Currently training 3-4 times a week after a break to slowly regain the pitiful fitness I achieved a few years ago. Free Spirit, come join us http://www.freespiritsrowing.com/forum/
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 4
- Joined: May 5th, 2025, 1:27 am
Re: Better 2k split
My practices are a lot of sprint training and rate controlled steady state. We also do a lot of interval training. On Monday Wednesdays Fridays and Saturdays we do water training while Tuesday and Thursdays are land days where we either erg or do bodyweight exercises . I don’t think we’ve ever done weight training for the whole season. Our coaches also train our mental fortitude so if any of us make a mistake or do something dumb the whole team has to do “x amount of x” so that “there’s no light at the end of the tunnel”iain wrote: ↑May 6th, 2025, 5:46 am15 year olds vary a lot with some people having largely matured at 13 while others are still growing rapidly and have under developed muscles at 17. Excessive training while you are growing rapidly will decrease your performance long term, so while a great 2k this year may sound great, it could come at the cost of any chance of a rowing scholarship at college. So I would not advise anything like that level of training for someone of your size and age. We only get faster when we are resting and if our bodies are growing and maturing then this will detract from the recovery of muscles and so more resting is required to deliver long term gains.CharTehDuck wrote: ↑May 5th, 2025, 4:38 pmI recently turned 15 in very late February and this is my first year of rowing as a U16. I'm a guy btw. I did cross country for a little bit in middle school I was very active in sports like soccer when I was younger and I play basketball with my dad. I have a lot of time available as I practice 6 times a week for 2 and a half hours each.
My own son was asked to perform a counter-productive volume and intensity of training at your age and I had to step in with his coaches when injuries were not being respected and no time was allowed to recover. This lead to increased match performance while some of his team mates were constantly performing below par! You might even find that you can do a 1:50 already with improved pacing and a proper taper beforehand. HOw do your sessions breakdown and what proportion of each is done at moderately hard intensity or above?
-
- 1k Poster
- Posts: 142
- Joined: November 4th, 2024, 1:58 am
- Location: Hong Kong
Re: Better 2k split
How much sprint training? There is a reason for 80/20 polarized training - the 80% sessions steady state for the aerobic gains, mitochondria, endurance, and 20% hard sessions to train top speed, etc.CharTehDuck wrote: ↑May 6th, 2025, 10:25 amMy practices are a lot of sprint training and rate controlled steady state. We also do a lot of interval training. On Monday Wednesdays Fridays and Saturdays we do water training while Tuesday and Thursdays are land days where we either erg or do bodyweight exercises . I don’t think we’ve ever done weight training for the whole season. Our coaches also train our mental fortitude so if any of us make a mistake or do something dumb the whole team has to do “x amount of x” so that “there’s no light at the end of the tunnel”iain wrote: ↑May 6th, 2025, 5:46 am15 year olds vary a lot with some people having largely matured at 13 while others are still growing rapidly and have under developed muscles at 17. Excessive training while you are growing rapidly will decrease your performance long term, so while a great 2k this year may sound great, it could come at the cost of any chance of a rowing scholarship at college. So I would not advise anything like that level of training for someone of your size and age. We only get faster when we are resting and if our bodies are growing and maturing then this will detract from the recovery of muscles and so more resting is required to deliver long term gains.CharTehDuck wrote: ↑May 5th, 2025, 4:38 pmI recently turned 15 in very late February and this is my first year of rowing as a U16. I'm a guy btw. I did cross country for a little bit in middle school I was very active in sports like soccer when I was younger and I play basketball with my dad. I have a lot of time available as I practice 6 times a week for 2 and a half hours each.
My own son was asked to perform a counter-productive volume and intensity of training at your age and I had to step in with his coaches when injuries were not being respected and no time was allowed to recover. This lead to increased match performance while some of his team mates were constantly performing below par! You might even find that you can do a 1:50 already with improved pacing and a proper taper beforehand. HOw do your sessions breakdown and what proportion of each is done at moderately hard intensity or above?
If it is more like 50/50, the aerobic end may be faltering. What is the rate in the 2k? Max HR? Rest HR?
Personally I find 1 hard session, 2 weights sessions and 2 base sessions manageable even under off-season or under heavier academic loads. The weight sessions were integral to fixing my weaknesses (e.g hip hinge, not protracting the scapula by 1”, active and effective range of motion). Doing horizontal rows with scapula protracted at the end significantly improved my shoulder stability, allowing me to gain 1” of length without sacrificing force.
Would suggest to polarize the training, focus on aerobic base, more steady state time. Keep UT2 below lactate threshold 1, or around 70% HRR (tweak more or less, 3 RPE). Eventually you should be able to get sub 1:50 by the end of the summer. Perhaps you could develop a bigger ut2 aerobic base in the summer - that could set you up for peaking later on for college (if you want)
18M 175 cm 67kg
(Nov 2024 serious start) 2024 PBs: 6900m 30r20, 12*500m R1 2:04 r24 (last 1:59 r20), 7:58 2k
2025 PBs: 2:25 UT2 pace, 1:33 LP, 23r20 2:07.1 pace, 8*500m 2R 1:59.4 r20 (last 1:57.7 r20)
(Nov 2024 serious start) 2024 PBs: 6900m 30r20, 12*500m R1 2:04 r24 (last 1:59 r20), 7:58 2k
2025 PBs: 2:25 UT2 pace, 1:33 LP, 23r20 2:07.1 pace, 8*500m 2R 1:59.4 r20 (last 1:57.7 r20)
Re: Better 2k split
It implies that these 2k's were done OTW it might be a bit trickier to compare to your erg times due to other external factors altering things; but if it was, I'd probably want to get a benchmark done on the erg so you know exactly what your metrics are.CharTehDuck wrote: ↑May 5th, 2025, 4:38 pmI'll try to get my 2k sub-divisions from my coxswains as I did it during a practice. I also did my second 2k 2 weeks after my first one so that may explain the little gap between the times.
I'm no coach, so not going to make any suggestions to your coach's rowing regimen, but just keep an eye on your fatigue levels - pushing too hard towards higher goals can result in excessive fatigue build-up.
PS
IMO this does no such thing - if anything it teaches people to hold something back a little because some-one is likely to make a mistake and then you all have to do some more anyway.Our coaches also train our mental fortitude so if any of us make a mistake or do something dumb the whole team has to do “x amount of x” so that “there’s no light at the end of the tunnel”
M 6'4 born:'82
PB's
'23: HM=1:36:08.0, 60'=13,702m
'24: 10k=42:13.1, FM=3:18:35.4, 30'=7,132m
'25: 500m=1:35.3, 2k=7:39.3, 5k=20:24.3, 6k: 25:05.4
Logbook
PB's
'23: HM=1:36:08.0, 60'=13,702m
'24: 10k=42:13.1, FM=3:18:35.4, 30'=7,132m
'25: 500m=1:35.3, 2k=7:39.3, 5k=20:24.3, 6k: 25:05.4
Logbook
-
- Paddler
- Posts: 4
- Joined: May 5th, 2025, 1:27 am
Re: Better 2k split
Sorry, I mean I did the 2k on the erg but it was one of the ergs at practice and I don't know which one. The coxswains keep a spreadsheet of all the rowers so I was trying to get my info on it. If I remember correctly I think my average rate was either 34 or 35. Could someone also explain the terms used like UT1 and other things. I also wasn't able to track my heart rate at the time but I've started wearing a watch but I'm still not too sure how accurate it is.p_b82 wrote: ↑May 6th, 2025, 1:20 pmIt implies that these 2k's were done OTW it might be a bit trickier to compare to your erg times due to other external factors altering things; but if it was, I'd probably want to get a benchmark done on the erg so you know exactly what your metrics are.CharTehDuck wrote: ↑May 5th, 2025, 4:38 pmI'll try to get my 2k sub-divisions from my coxswains as I did it during a practice. I also did my second 2k 2 weeks after my first one so that may explain the little gap between the times.
I'm no coach, so not going to make any suggestions to your coach's rowing regimen, but just keep an eye on your fatigue levels - pushing too hard towards higher goals can result in excessive fatigue build-up.
PSIMO this does no such thing - if anything it teaches people to hold something back a little because some-one is likely to make a mistake and then you all have to do some more anyway.Our coaches also train our mental fortitude so if any of us make a mistake or do something dumb the whole team has to do “x amount of x” so that “there’s no light at the end of the tunnel”
Re: Better 2k split
At only 2 weeks apart, you're not really allowing much time for adaptations to take place to improve your 2k so gains are more likely due to improved technique or race plan. But any improvement is great so keep hold of that! Testing at at least 6 week intervals would be more enlightening. A 2k TT at rate 34 or 35 sounds about right. Training pieces would often be done at a much lower rate (20 to 24). Your muscles use various fuel sources and operate in different ways that ALL need training. The hardest to get right is the aerobic training. It takes the longest to improve (months/years), it takes a lot of seat time, it needs a careful individual approach that suits you or it risks just becoming so boring you don't do it, and it feels slow. The sprint intervals near max, the long intervals at transition, and the TTs are all physically harder, but for most, motivationally easier because it feels like you're working hard and the feedback is constant improvement. But with just them you'll quickly plateau and struggle for long term improvement.
So UT1, UT2, UT3 (Utility 1, 2, 3) are terms used for HR zones where you will be training Aerobically. There's some science involved, but the more you get into it the more you realise its guesswork based on approximations so don't take anyone's view of the exact numbers as Gospel. To train within HR Zones its first fundamental to know what your personal MaxHR and RestingHR are. MaxHR is painful to find out - none of the oft touted formulae are any use as they will be wrong for more people than they are right for. To see MHR some prescribe a step test based on increasing pace over a series of 4 minute blocks to failure. Some of us find an acceptable approximation to be a competitive 5 or 6 or 10k TT where we manage to sprint for the last minute or so. MHR is whatever it is for you - no amount of training is likely to change it - it will slowly lower as you age. Resting HR is easier, just look at your watch when you wake up in the morning. RHR will get lower the fitter you get. Most accept we train aerobically when our HR goes up to 70% of max. Theoretically UT1 goes up to 80% and there's more than one way to calculate the % which can get even higher numbers. But as I said its all a bit of guesswork and approximation anyway so don't overthink it too much. If you believe in or just want to try the 80/20 model then the 80% is aerobic training and needs to be done with a cap somewhere in the 70-80% MHR area and according to some is just as beneficial at 65%.
But you should note that this is based on elite athlete training and they spend hugely more time doing it and need to be very careful about recovery. Also your watch probably wont be reliable on the erg - if you're serious about monitoring HR on the erg, get a chest strap. HTH
So UT1, UT2, UT3 (Utility 1, 2, 3) are terms used for HR zones where you will be training Aerobically. There's some science involved, but the more you get into it the more you realise its guesswork based on approximations so don't take anyone's view of the exact numbers as Gospel. To train within HR Zones its first fundamental to know what your personal MaxHR and RestingHR are. MaxHR is painful to find out - none of the oft touted formulae are any use as they will be wrong for more people than they are right for. To see MHR some prescribe a step test based on increasing pace over a series of 4 minute blocks to failure. Some of us find an acceptable approximation to be a competitive 5 or 6 or 10k TT where we manage to sprint for the last minute or so. MHR is whatever it is for you - no amount of training is likely to change it - it will slowly lower as you age. Resting HR is easier, just look at your watch when you wake up in the morning. RHR will get lower the fitter you get. Most accept we train aerobically when our HR goes up to 70% of max. Theoretically UT1 goes up to 80% and there's more than one way to calculate the % which can get even higher numbers. But as I said its all a bit of guesswork and approximation anyway so don't overthink it too much. If you believe in or just want to try the 80/20 model then the 80% is aerobic training and needs to be done with a cap somewhere in the 70-80% MHR area and according to some is just as beneficial at 65%.
But you should note that this is based on elite athlete training and they spend hugely more time doing it and need to be very careful about recovery. Also your watch probably wont be reliable on the erg - if you're serious about monitoring HR on the erg, get a chest strap. HTH
Mike - 67 HWT 183

