Ranger's training thread

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by hjs » March 14th, 2011, 4:39 am

stroke wrote:
A fact, by definition, is something that actually exists. When and if Paul Siebach breaks Roy's record it will become a fact, at the moment it is just another diversion you are using because you cannot explain(without admitting failure) why you did not break Roy's record. You failed and thats a FACT. Roy's record still stands thats another fact.
If you ever show us some screen shots they may be facts but until you do they are not facts just a dream or a goal.
As young people say today on the internet "picture or it didn't happen".C'mon Rich cut to the chase show us a shot of the PM4 of some of your training sessions.
He not just failed, but failed year are after year. He raced more than anybody else.

And he not just did that he also said evey year that that year he would erg 6.16

He also said every year that this year was different, he was now 100% ready and his strokes was finally fixed.

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by hjs » March 14th, 2011, 4:41 am

stroke wrote:
ranger wrote:
stroke wrote: What happened to the oft stated goal of smashing Rocket Roy's soft world record? It may indeed be soft but it proved too hard for you.
If I pull a lwt 6:16 2K at 60, I won't care that someone five years younger pulled a 2K 22 seconds slower.

If I pull a lwt 6:16 at 60, I won't care that someone five years younger pulled a 2K 22 seconds slower.

Roy's record will soon be gone.

It is indeed soft.

The same year that Roy pulled 6:38, I pulled 6:29.7, at max drag, without even preparing for it, just on the basis of low rate rowing, working on technique.

ranger
And your weight and age at the time you pulled 6:29.7 was?
Way above 80 kg, but this row was indeed very impressive, his best row ever looking at his age than, that same year he rowed as a lightweight and got a 7.xx plus.................

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » March 14th, 2011, 5:51 am

Nice hour on the Kurt Kinetic after a similar hour of erging.

HR flat at 155 bpm.

This biking is now _very_ easy.

I can push it out to 50 miles (2.5 hours) and will do so over the next month or so.

Rowing at 155 bpm is similarly easy.

Now, I just need to push that out to 2.5 hours, too, HR flat at 155 bpm.

Both done for 2.5 hours on the same day would be an "ultra" workout.

Five hours.

I'll see if I can work up to that over the summer (heck, or earlier, if it just happens).

ranger
Last edited by ranger on March 14th, 2011, 6:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » March 14th, 2011, 5:58 am

hjs wrote:Way above 80 kg
Hardly.

Two weeks later, I weighed in at WIRC 2006 at 73 kg./162 lbs. and rowed with a lightweight stamp.

I did the 6:29.7 at high drag, without preparing for it, just on the basis of low rate rowing.

The closest thing I did to a sharpening workout was 6 x 2K at 20 spm, 21 spm, 22 spm, 23 spm, 24 spm, and 25 spm.

1:52, 1:50, 1:48, 1:46, 1:44, 1:42

A solid AT workout.

I pulled the 2K, 1:37.4 @ 32 spm (12 SPI)

So, it was probably an AT 2K.

I didn't do any TR and AN training.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

lancs
2k Poster
Posts: 371
Joined: February 5th, 2010, 3:22 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by lancs » March 14th, 2011, 6:16 am

ranger wrote:
lancs wrote:It will indeed predict a 6:16 2k.
Happy to hear you agree.

So why don't we leave it there?
We won't leave it there because I don't want anyone thinking you can even pull a 10k at 1:48 pace, because you can't.

I'd hate to think that anyone unfamiliar with your pathology thinks you're even a sub-6:30 rower any more, because you're not.

That's why we won't leave it there. Get it?

JimR
5k Poster
Posts: 544
Joined: March 20th, 2006, 1:08 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by JimR » March 14th, 2011, 6:48 am

ranger wrote:The other day, my hour OTBike at 165 bpm was a mistake, especially for a cross-training routine.

I felt the effects the next day. I couldn't row. My legs were tired.
Stop the presses ... what happened to mr. "may training never makes me stale"??? You recently said you never miss a day except when life gets in the way ... and here is information that refutes that (surprise)!

What day did this unprecendented event happen?!

JimR

User avatar
Steve G
2k Poster
Posts: 312
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 4:02 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Steve G » March 14th, 2011, 7:01 am

JimR wrote:
ranger wrote:The other day, my hour OTBike at 165 bpm was a mistake, especially for a cross-training routine.

I felt the effects the next day. I couldn't row. My legs were tired.
Stop the presses ... what happened to mr. "may training never makes me stale"??? You recently said you never miss a day except when life gets in the way ... and here is information that refutes that (surprise)!

What day did this unprecendented event happen?!

JimR
It happened before many pages ago !
Why not stop the "biking" and just do 40K on the erg?
You have said for years you will increase your metres to a marathon a day!

Steve

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by hjs » March 14th, 2011, 7:08 am

ranger wrote:
hjs wrote:Way above 80 kg
Hardly.

Two weeks later, I weighed in at WIRC 2006 at 73 kg./162 lbs. and rowed with a lightweight stamp.

ranger
And rowed 30 seconds plus slower...................

User avatar
mikvan52
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 2648
Joined: March 9th, 2007, 3:49 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by mikvan52 » March 14th, 2011, 8:19 am

I just read the replies now (with ranger offal safely on "foe")...
What gets me most is that this is a thread where, exclusively, aging men respond to an internet troll.

I used to think that, being a lightweight and less than two years younger, I would eventually face Cureton at Crash-B or the HOCR. Now, I no longer think this to be at all probable.

What you see before your eyes and under your fingers is ranger's only domain. It is what he lives for. He hates to compete, He is a cyber-entity, nothing else.
There are no facts and figures. No regattas to speak of. No peak efforts. Just twisted history from a slowly dimming past.

On our side, everything, every thought, every analysis, has already been stated many times. We are consequently, only redundant.
C2 should just archive this thread and lock it.
3 Crash-B hammers
American 60's Lwt. 2k record (6:49) •• set WRs for 60' & FM •• ~ now surpassed
repeat combined Masters Lwt & Hwt 1x National Champion E & F class
62 yrs, 160 lbs, 6' ...

User avatar
Steve G
2k Poster
Posts: 312
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 4:02 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by Steve G » March 14th, 2011, 8:30 am

mikvan52 wrote:I just read the replies now (with ranger offal safely on "foe")...
What gets me most is that this is a thread where, exclusively, aging men respond to an internet troll.

I used to think that, being a lightweight and less than two years younger, I would eventually face Cureton at Crash-B or the HOCR. Now, I no longer think this to be at all probable.

What you see before your eyes and under your fingers is ranger's only domain. It is what he lives for. He hates to compete, He is a cyber-entity, nothing else.
There are no facts and figures. No regattas to speak of. No peak efforts. Just twisted history from a slowly dimming past.

On our side, everything, every thought, every analysis, has already been stated many times. We are consequently, only redundant.
C2 should just archive this thread and lock it.
Very true Mike, but you were one of the main contributors!
Leave the thread open, it's all in fun, we know he wont post any results, workouts etc!

Steve

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » March 14th, 2011, 8:43 am

lancs wrote:We won't leave it there
Glad to know we are agreed to leave it there.

With another month or so of steady state distance training, a FM @ 155 bpm won't be hard for me at all.

I'll now pull (at least) 1:48 at 155 bpm.

12 SPI

23 spm

4-to-1 ratio

119 df.

That will put all the artificially manufactured, insubstantial controversy here to rest and I can just finish my race preparation and pull 6:16.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » March 14th, 2011, 8:55 am

stroke wrote:C'mon Rich cut to the chase show us a shot of the PM4 of some of your training sessions
That's exactly the intention.

The distance events are just 2K training.

The first screen shot I'll post of my training is a FM @ 1:48, HR steady at 155 bpm.

Then, I'll work my way down through HM, 60min, 10K, 30min, 6K, and 5K.

ranger
Last edited by ranger on March 14th, 2011, 8:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

User avatar
hjs
Marathon Poster
Posts: 10076
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Location: Amstelveen the netherlands

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by hjs » March 14th, 2011, 8:55 am

Although I won't make it a habit but I will make dangy's day..............


Yesterday Matthias Auer broke Mike C record. It is now 6.17.4, it was rowed at the E-Cup in Frankfurt-Fechenheim. Matthias just turned 40 a week afer crash, so he could not do it there.
Last year he also broke the 30/40 marathon record.
He is a otw rower/erger who almost does no speedwork, he is a ferm believer is long medium fast work.
He also doesn't do low rate work.



Very well done Matthias, congrats!

ranger
Marathon Poster
Posts: 11629
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:27 pm

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by ranger » March 14th, 2011, 8:58 am

hjs wrote:Although I won't make it a habit but I will make dangy's day..............


Yesterday Matthias Auer broke Mike C record. It is now 6.17.4, it was rowed at the E-Cup in Frankfurt-Fechenheim. Matthias just turned 40 a week afer crash, so he could not do it there.
Last year he also broke the 30/40 marathon record.
He is a otw rower/erger who almost does no speedwork, he is a ferm believer is long medium fast work.
He also doesn't do low rate work.



Very well done Matthias, congrats!
Great to hear, although, as you know, I always wish Mike C. well.

He has been so good to me, I always feel obligated to return the favor.

:D :D

Many congrats to Matthias.

Of course, like Roy's, Mike C.'s record has always been soft, too.

:D :D

That's a _fact_.

ranger
Rich Cureton M 72 5'11" 165 lbs. 2K pbs: 6:27.5 (hwt), 6:28 (lwt)

snowleopard
6k Poster
Posts: 936
Joined: September 23rd, 2009, 4:16 am

Re: Ranger's training thread

Post by snowleopard » March 14th, 2011, 9:15 am

ranger wrote:Roy's record has always been soft
So soft you couldn't break it. What are you, a marshmallow or a powderpuff?

Locked