Good luck. Be reminded the document from 2001 prepared for the UM women's rowing team is more or less a Cliff's Notes version of the Wolverine Plan. It's a good start, but there's a lot more explanation available if you are interested. I recommend the archives of the old forum, specifically the "Wolverine Plan Discussion" thread (you do have to wade through a lot of fluff by trolls and thread hijackers but I address practically every question ever asked about the WP).DanielJ wrote:Now I've actually read the PDF over properly, understood it etc. I feel like it suits me. Let's see.
Which plan do you think
-
- 2k Poster
- Posts: 277
- Joined: April 20th, 2006, 10:37 pm
- Location: Coronado, CA
Re: Which plan do you think
- jackarabit
- Marathon Poster
- Posts: 5838
- Joined: June 14th, 2014, 9:51 am
Re: Which plan do you think
Returning to the OP's question, the Pete Plan borrows heavily from the WP but omits L4 workouts as I understand it. You may do well with it if you have the base miles. All about that base, 'bout that base. Jack
There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
M_77_5'-7"_156lb

M_77_5'-7"_156lb

Re: Which plan do you think
Thanks, Mike! It's epic that you responded!Mike Caviston wrote:Good luck. Be reminded the document from 2001 prepared for the UM women's rowing team is more or less a Cliff's Notes version of the Wolverine Plan. It's a good start, but there's a lot more explanation available if you are interested. I recommend the archives of the old forum, specifically the "Wolverine Plan Discussion" thread (you do have to wade through a lot of fluff by trolls and thread hijackers but I address practically every question ever asked about the WP).DanielJ wrote:Now I've actually read the PDF over properly, understood it etc. I feel like it suits me. Let's see.
And yes, indeed, I've read the original PDF, the "remarks" PDF (http://www.eudemonia.co.uk/wp%20notes.pdf), and this discussion thread (http://concept2.van-diepen.nl/forum/Wol ... ion_02.htm), all thoroughly, and they're all bookmarked and ready for re-reading.
30, 6'2 (1.88m); 179 lb (81 kg)
Learning, improving, getting stronger, and wanting more.

Recent tests: 1:41.7/500 for 1k; 1:34.9/500 for 2 minutes
Learning, improving, getting stronger, and wanting more.
Recent tests: 1:41.7/500 for 1k; 1:34.9/500 for 2 minutes