Yep.macroth wrote:Is that so?
ranger
Yep.macroth wrote:Is that so?
RWBs is done at a _very_ high stroking power (for me, 15 SPI, etc.) over relatively short intervals (not much more than 500m an interval) with a high HR (e.g., AT) at max drag and brief rest between intervals.MRapp wrote:You claim to not be RWB's any longer.
Except that you have to take a break every 500m to keep your heart inside your chest.ranger wrote: This is just normal stuff.
No, my HR is just a modest UT1, steady state.whp4 wrote:Except that you have to take a break every 500m to keep your heart inside your chest.ranger wrote: This is just normal stuff.
Sure, the next numbers to come in (from distance trials and sharpening workouts) will be entertaining.MRapp wrote:Come on now, this is your show, entertain us
So why not post a picture of these astounding daily rows? Probably because reality is significantly different than your claims. You're pathetic.ranger wrote:MRapp wrote:Come on now, this is your show, entertain us
The pace I ride along at in my "Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy" session is _very_ fast (1:42) for a 60-year-old lightweight, given that I am only rating 26 spm in a 3.5-to-1 ratio.
ranger
These daily rows are just training at the moment, not racing.atklein90 wrote:So why not post a picture of these astounding daily rows?
perhaps rangerboy will, when - or rather if - he becomes expert enough in photoshop.atklein90 wrote:So why not post a picture of these astounding daily rows? Probably because reality is significantly different than your claims. You're pathetic.ranger wrote:MRapp wrote:Come on now, this is your show, entertain us
The pace I ride along at in my "Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy" session is _very_ fast (1:42) for a 60-year-old lightweight, given that I am only rating 26 spm in a 3.5-to-1 ratio.
ranger
Sure.mikvan52 wrote:If so, he would have to have the ability to pull a 1:25 500
Sorry to hear you were injured.mikvan52 wrote:I am out of shape, due to an injury from which I am now almost fully recovered.