Folks,
I'm putting together my training calendar for the next 6 months and wanted to see if anyone was aware of substitutes for the typical HR-based training regimens. I've had a lot of trouble in the last year or so with the HR-based approach, principally because of several factors. For one, the temperature range of my workout environment is pretty varied, such that on some days, a 20-minute 155 bpm piece that would normally be in UT1 feels more like AT. For another, my mix of workouts has tended to focus on OTW training, which has a different set of training bands associated with different intensities.
I realize this question may sound insane, but it's a real one.
mrpeepers
Alternatives to HR-based training
-
- 6k Poster
- Posts: 901
- Joined: November 18th, 2008, 11:21 pm
Re: Alternatives to HR-based training
Lactate testing
Much more difficult, expensive, and time consuming, but also much more precise.
Much more difficult, expensive, and time consuming, but also much more precise.
PBs: 2k 6:09.0 (2020), 6k 19:38.9 (2020), 10k 33:55.5 (2019), 60' 17,014m (2018), HM 1:13:27.5 (2019)
Old PBs: LP 1:09.9 (~2010), 100m 16.1 (~2010), 500m 1:26.7 (~2010), 1k 3:07.0 (~2010)
Old PBs: LP 1:09.9 (~2010), 100m 16.1 (~2010), 500m 1:26.7 (~2010), 1k 3:07.0 (~2010)
Re: Alternatives to HR-based training
The Pete Plan is based on past performance not HR
- gregsmith01748
- 10k Poster
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: January 8th, 2010, 2:17 pm
- Location: Hopkinton, MA
Re: Alternatives to HR-based training
Same with Wolverine Plan. It is a progressive plan based on past results, not heart rate.
Greg
Age: 55 H: 182cm W: 90Kg

Age: 55 H: 182cm W: 90Kg

Re: Alternatives to HR-based training
OK, thanks all!