Heart Rate / 500m Pace / Training Band disconnect
Posted: July 5th, 2007, 1:50 pm
I wonder if anyone has ideas about what is going on here?
I've been rowing mostly for weight loss (lost 70+ pounds in 9 months) by doing long rows (10k+) 4-5x/wk. Usually I would keep the HR in the 140-150 range, which should be my UT1 band. I've noticed that as the weeks pass, I row faster while still keeping a slower HR, so I must be getting fitter, but the disconnect is that the way I feel during/after the row doesn't fit with what the HR/training band is saying.
In other words, a few months back, I'd do 10k at 2:10 with the HR in the low 150's, and feel pretty beat at the end.
Now I can do a 10k at 2:02, the HR never leaves the low 140s, but I feel TOTALLY exhausted at the end. Theoretically, I'm working in a lower band, so why do I feel like I worked out so much harder?
To test this, yesterday I decided that I'd try to do 10k at 1:58 or so. I crashed after 6k, although my HR at the time was 148, still in "UT1".
I went to the UK website (http://www.concept2.co.uk/training/) and used their calculator to come up with a plan for race training (now that the weight loss phase is over), and this revealed the same disconnect. The table the website fed me (after entering my data, such as best 2k at 7:09, resting HR of 40) was:
Zone Heart Rate HRR% Pace
UT2 - Aerobic Endurance 132 - 139 65 - 70 2:20 - 2:07
UT1 - Intense Aerobic 139 - 153 70 - 80 2:07 - 2:01
AT - Threshold 153 - 160 80 - 85 2:01 - 1:56
TR - Transport 160 - 174 85 - 95 1:56 - 1:46
AN - Max 174 - 181 95 - 100 1:46 - 1:42
So, my rowing at a pace of 1:58 should have put me in the AT, and my body certainly felt like I was in AT, but my HR never got close to the upper 150s.
I have had my HR belt on during my 2k tests, and sure enough I do hit 179-180 at the end of the piece, so I know my maximal HR seems to fit the equations.
Ideas from any ace physiologist out there?
I've been rowing mostly for weight loss (lost 70+ pounds in 9 months) by doing long rows (10k+) 4-5x/wk. Usually I would keep the HR in the 140-150 range, which should be my UT1 band. I've noticed that as the weeks pass, I row faster while still keeping a slower HR, so I must be getting fitter, but the disconnect is that the way I feel during/after the row doesn't fit with what the HR/training band is saying.
In other words, a few months back, I'd do 10k at 2:10 with the HR in the low 150's, and feel pretty beat at the end.
Now I can do a 10k at 2:02, the HR never leaves the low 140s, but I feel TOTALLY exhausted at the end. Theoretically, I'm working in a lower band, so why do I feel like I worked out so much harder?
To test this, yesterday I decided that I'd try to do 10k at 1:58 or so. I crashed after 6k, although my HR at the time was 148, still in "UT1".
I went to the UK website (http://www.concept2.co.uk/training/) and used their calculator to come up with a plan for race training (now that the weight loss phase is over), and this revealed the same disconnect. The table the website fed me (after entering my data, such as best 2k at 7:09, resting HR of 40) was:
Zone Heart Rate HRR% Pace
UT2 - Aerobic Endurance 132 - 139 65 - 70 2:20 - 2:07
UT1 - Intense Aerobic 139 - 153 70 - 80 2:07 - 2:01
AT - Threshold 153 - 160 80 - 85 2:01 - 1:56
TR - Transport 160 - 174 85 - 95 1:56 - 1:46
AN - Max 174 - 181 95 - 100 1:46 - 1:42
So, my rowing at a pace of 1:58 should have put me in the AT, and my body certainly felt like I was in AT, but my HR never got close to the upper 150s.
I have had my HR belt on during my 2k tests, and sure enough I do hit 179-180 at the end of the piece, so I know my maximal HR seems to fit the equations.
Ideas from any ace physiologist out there?