Yes! I want this too!jamesg wrote:Table headline visible when we scroll down.
Nonathlon - Logo & Ideas
- Andy Nield
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 74
- Joined: March 22nd, 2006, 5:56 am
- Location: Banyoles
I think (but might be wrong) that is actually a bit (very) tricky without using framesseat5 wrote:Yes! I want this too!jamesg wrote:Table headline visible when we scroll down.

How about I do some plastic stickers with the headings on that you can fix on the screen


What about the option to repeat the header every 25ish rows?
You know the answer is to row harder so you get on the first page!



Here's an example of repeated headers, click the image to get a bigger version...
[img]http://www.nielda.co.uk/pics/c2sig.gif[/img]
[color=orange][i]It never gets any easier... you just get faster...[/i][/color]
[color=orange][i]It never gets any easier... you just get faster...[/i][/color]
That looks like a good solution to me.Andy Nield wrote:
What about the option to repeat the header every 25ish rows?
Here's an example of repeated headers, click the image to get a bigger version...
And thanks for creating and maintaining the nonathlon. I really appreciate it.
Bob S. , the crazy old man.
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
You can use frames, but don't let them show, i.e. remove the lines in between them.
I like the green.
I like the green.

bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
- Andy Nield
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 74
- Joined: March 22nd, 2006, 5:56 am
- Location: Banyoles
frames are not good for many reasons...
However I have figured out how to get scroll bars in a div, figuring out how to get IE and firefox to display the same thing was slightly more 'interesting'...
Anyway, you'll be pleased to hear that there will be the option to have a scrollable ranking table with fixed header as per the picture below...

click the pic for a bigger pic...
However I have figured out how to get scroll bars in a div, figuring out how to get IE and firefox to display the same thing was slightly more 'interesting'...




Anyway, you'll be pleased to hear that there will be the option to have a scrollable ranking table with fixed header as per the picture below...


click the pic for a bigger pic...
[img]http://www.nielda.co.uk/pics/c2sig.gif[/img]
[color=orange][i]It never gets any easier... you just get faster...[/i][/color]
[color=orange][i]It never gets any easier... you just get faster...[/i][/color]
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
- Andy Nield
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 74
- Joined: March 22nd, 2006, 5:56 am
- Location: Banyoles
-
- 1k Poster
- Posts: 145
- Joined: October 27th, 2006, 6:15 pm
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
Combine the gender & weight columns like the CTC does.
f
F
m
M
is easier to read than
F L
F H
M L
M H
and gets rid of clutter.
Put 30' between 6k and 10k.
f
F
m
M
is easier to read than
F L
F H
M L
M H
and gets rid of clutter.
Put 30' between 6k and 10k.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
- johnlvs2run
- Half Marathon Poster
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
- Location: California Central Coast
- Contact:
I guess the green highlight means improved total in the last 7 days.John Rupp wrote:Combine the gender & weight columns like the CTC does.
Put 30' between 6k and 10k.
Suggestion: also highlight the improved event score, so people can tell what event was improved.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2
- Andy Nield
- 500m Poster
- Posts: 74
- Joined: March 22nd, 2006, 5:56 am
- Location: Banyoles
I did consider it, and it's easy enough to do, but it involves doing a date time comparison on 10 fields for every row it would effect the time it takes to load the ranking page.
Might have another look at it now it's been asked for.
Might have another look at it now it's been asked for.
[img]http://www.nielda.co.uk/pics/c2sig.gif[/img]
[color=orange][i]It never gets any easier... you just get faster...[/i][/color]
[color=orange][i]It never gets any easier... you just get faster...[/i][/color]