Beginner question -- mainly about stroke rate.

General discussion on Training. How to get better on your erg, how to use your erg to get better at another sport, or anything else about improving your abilities.
Baltimark
Paddler
Posts: 6
Joined: June 25th, 2008, 10:28 am

Post by Baltimark » June 27th, 2008, 1:10 pm

John Rupp wrote:Ohh if that's the case, then just slide back and forth, after all if you can go faster easily then that's good.
That's not what I mean. I wasn't "moving the boat" any faster. I just had a fast rating. That's why I started this whole thing. I was moving like 35+ strokes per minute, but I wasn't going anywhere.

And, yes, skating indoors. . .short track.

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Post by johnlvs2run » June 27th, 2008, 1:15 pm

Short track is scary stuff.

You must be in great shape from that, and from racing your bike.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

tdekoekkoek
1k Poster
Posts: 194
Joined: December 22nd, 2007, 12:21 am
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by tdekoekkoek » June 27th, 2008, 2:57 pm

John Rupp wrote: > rowing at low ratings should always be done at low intensity;
> rowing with intensity at low ratings precludes learning to row well at higher ones.
This is entirely wrong. While much training at low rates should be done at low intensity (read aerobic training), much benefit can be derived from learning to drive the "boat" efficiently at high intensity and low rates. Ask just about any coach of top-level boats and they do a massive amount of low rate work. Our club has just qualified a few rowers to the USA team for Worlds and these guys can really move the boat at low rates. Learning to apply that power at low rates helps them at high rates. I often see the Harvard eights going by at 16spm and they are moving the boat faster than many boats going 26-28.

Learning to row powerfully at low rates is essential for really getting the most improvement in strength and technique. Personally I do a lot of rowing at 20spm usually around 1:52, but sometimes I will increase the intensity without increasing the rate down to a 1:45 or so. I also do low intensity work at around an 18 and then I usually am focusing on recovery so 2:05 splits or so is fine. This training helped me row my PBs both in the hour at around 1:48 pace and in my 2K (1:37 pace).

Regards,

Trevor
Trevor de Koekkoek: 46yrs, 190lbs

[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1204034405.png[/img]
Latest Rowing Videos:[url=http://www.rowtube.net]http://www.rowtube.net[/url]

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Post by johnlvs2run » June 27th, 2008, 4:26 pm

Danes and Italians > WORLD AND OLYMPIC champions -> 39 SPM on the water.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Post by johnlvs2run » June 27th, 2008, 4:29 pm

John Rupp wrote:rowing with intensity at low ratings precludes learning to row well at higher ones.
tdekoekkoek wrote:This is entirely wrong.
But that you can't do it kind of proves my point doesn't it.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

User avatar
PaulS
10k Poster
Posts: 1212
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:07 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by PaulS » June 27th, 2008, 5:27 pm

tdekoekkoek wrote:
John Rupp wrote: > rowing at low ratings should always be done at low intensity;
> rowing with intensity at low ratings precludes learning to row well at higher ones.
This is entirely wrong. While much training at low rates should be done at low intensity (read aerobic training), much benefit can be derived from learning to drive the "boat" efficiently at high intensity and low rates. Ask just about any coach of top-level boats and they do a massive amount of low rate work. Our club has just qualified a few rowers to the USA team for Worlds and these guys can really move the boat at low rates. Learning to apply that power at low rates helps them at high rates. I often see the Harvard eights going by at 16spm and they are moving the boat faster than many boats going 26-28.

Learning to row powerfully at low rates is essential for really getting the most improvement in strength and technique. Personally I do a lot of rowing at 20spm usually around 1:52, but sometimes I will increase the intensity without increasing the rate down to a 1:45 or so. I also do low intensity work at around an 18 and then I usually am focusing on recovery so 2:05 splits or so is fine. This training helped me row my PBs both in the hour at around 1:48 pace and in my 2K (1:37 pace).

Regards,

Trevor
Trevor,

Beware the Ruppintaor, he will get upset at you bringing facts into the discussion, and start spouting Eskild This, Eskild that, as if he knows anything about what Eskild actually does at any time other than a WR attempt at a 2k on the Erg, which Eskild himself said "It's okay if you are going for a WR, but otherwise don't do it that way." B)
Erg on,
Paul Smith
www.ps-sport.net Your source for Useful Rowing Accessories and Training Assistance.
"If you don't want to know the answer, don't ask me the question."

tdekoekkoek
1k Poster
Posts: 194
Joined: December 22nd, 2007, 12:21 am
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by tdekoekkoek » June 27th, 2008, 5:40 pm

John Rupp wrote:
John Rupp wrote:rowing with intensity at low ratings precludes learning to row well at higher ones.
tdekoekkoek wrote:This is entirely wrong.
But that you can't do it kind of proves my point doesn't it.
What can't I do? Row well at high rates? I hope you are not saying that. First off, no need to get insulting. Secondly you don't know me nor anything about my rowing abilities, although you can find some of my results if you want to google me
Trevor de Koekkoek: 46yrs, 190lbs

[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1204034405.png[/img]
Latest Rowing Videos:[url=http://www.rowtube.net]http://www.rowtube.net[/url]

tdekoekkoek
1k Poster
Posts: 194
Joined: December 22nd, 2007, 12:21 am
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by tdekoekkoek » June 27th, 2008, 6:01 pm

PaulS wrote:
Trevor,

Beware the Ruppintaor, he will get upset at you bringing facts into the discussion, and start spouting Eskild This, Eskild that, as if he knows anything about what Eskild actually does at any time other than a WR attempt at a 2k on the Erg, which Eskild himself said "It's okay if you are going for a WR, but otherwise don't do it that way." B)
Thanks for the heads up Paul! Yeah most of the time I don't respond to some of the things John espouses, but this was a bit much. Especially when giving advice to people just starting out. And as for Eskild, I spoke to some of our top rowers about his performance and most said that he was very short at the catch and that was only effective on the erg and not to be applied elsewhere. Good that he confirmed this.
Trevor de Koekkoek: 46yrs, 190lbs

[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1204034405.png[/img]
Latest Rowing Videos:[url=http://www.rowtube.net]http://www.rowtube.net[/url]

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Post by johnlvs2run » June 27th, 2008, 6:26 pm

tdekoekkoek wrote:What can't I do? Row well at high rates? I hope you are not saying that.
Actually I thought you were the one who said that, which proves my point is right, that you said was wrong.

If that's not right, then what was your rating for your 2k.
First off, no need to get insulting. Secondly you don't know me nor anything about my rowing abilities, although you can find some of my results if you want to google me
Yep no need to get insulting. You have your rowing times in your signature, 195 pounds, used to have your height on there, 6'5 or 6'6? And you've done a 6:29 for the 2k.
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

Bob S.
Marathon Poster
Posts: 5142
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:00 pm

Post by Bob S. » June 27th, 2008, 10:54 pm

Baltimark wrote:

I figured that since I was going fast, I was automatically doing work, but I realize -- now -- that you can just kind of keep the wheel spinning without putting much power into it.

So, it's no wonder I was pulling about 38 s/m.

Now, I'm sure that my form is still pretty weak, but at least I figured out why I was rowing twice as fast as some of those monsters on youTube.
Baltimark,

There is a slight semantics problem here. You use the word "fast" when it appears that you really mean using a high rate (like 35spm and up). Most people on this forum interpret fast to mean rowing a boat at a high rate of speed through the water or rowing on a machine with a high watt (or Calorie) reading or a low pace reading. A fast slide does not count for much unless it goes along with a really hard pull.

Bob S.

tdekoekkoek
1k Poster
Posts: 194
Joined: December 22nd, 2007, 12:21 am
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by tdekoekkoek » June 27th, 2008, 11:10 pm

John Rupp wrote:
tdekoekkoek wrote:What can't I do? Row well at high rates? I hope you are not saying that.
Actually I thought you were the one who said that, which proves my point is right, that you said was wrong.

If that's not right, then what was your rating for your 2k.
First off, no need to get insulting. Secondly you don't know me nor anything about my rowing abilities, although you can find some of my results if you want to google me
Yep no need to get insulting. You have your rowing times in your signature, 195 pounds, used to have your height on there, 6'5 or 6'6? And you've done a 6:29 for the 2k.
No I never said that I don't know how to row well at high rates. In fact in the single I go off the line at a 40. Not too many people can do that. For my 2K in February I was at a 31 for most of it.

And as for my height, just shy of 6'4".
Trevor de Koekkoek: 46yrs, 190lbs

[img]http://www.c2ctc.com/sigs/img1204034405.png[/img]
Latest Rowing Videos:[url=http://www.rowtube.net]http://www.rowtube.net[/url]

Nosmo
10k Poster
Posts: 1595
Joined: November 21st, 2006, 3:39 pm

Post by Nosmo » June 27th, 2008, 11:56 pm

tdekoekkoek wrote: In fact in the single I go off the line at a 40. Not too many people can do that. For my 2K in February I was at a 31 for most of it.

And as for my height, just shy of 6'4".
There are many in my club who do it higher then that with no problem....

they just happen to be under 5'4". :)

User avatar
johnlvs2run
Half Marathon Poster
Posts: 4012
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 1:13 pm
Location: California Central Coast
Contact:

Post by johnlvs2run » June 28th, 2008, 12:33 am

You did the 2k at 31 spm, which PROVES my point.
tdekoekkoek wrote:For my 2K in February I was at a 31 for most of it.
In fact what I said was that:
John Rupp wrote:rowing with intensity at low ratings precludes learning to row well at higher ones
QED
bikeerg 75 5'8" 155# - 18.5 - 51.9 - 568 - 1:52.7 - 8:03.8 - 20:13.1 - 14620 - 40:58.7 - 28855 - 1:23:48.0
rowerg 56-58 5'8.5" 143# - 1:39.6 - 3:35.6 - 7:24.0 - 18:57.4 - 22:49.9 - 7793 - 38:44.7 - 1:22:48.9 - 2:58:46.2

User avatar
Yankeerunner
10k Poster
Posts: 1193
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 12:17 pm
Location: West Newbury, MA
Contact:

Post by Yankeerunner » June 28th, 2008, 6:40 am

tdekoekkoek wrote:

Thanks for the heads up Paul! Yeah most of the time I don't respond to some of the things John espouses, but this was a bit much. Especially when giving advice to people just starting out.
I've pretty much given up on Rupp too after years of watching him become more of a troll than a useful contributor. Most longtime forumites seem to have done the same. What continues to irk though is that he targets newbies with bad advice in his attempts to insult those that he has chosen to hold in disdain.

Post Reply