
Splits: 2:07.1 (29), 2:07.6 (29), 2:07.9 (29), 2:06.9 (31).
Thanks Mike, it was about 1:58 for me and 2:08 for Carol, we lost a bit on the changeovers so the pace you held for most of your 'turn' was faster than that to make up for it.MPx wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 6:47 amWell done Susan. Completing yet another HM is quite an achievement in itself never mind the time which will no doubt improve further this season.
..and just seen your and Carol's new World Record Rod. Wooohooo! Much as I love 500 intervals...the idea of doing them for nearly 7 hours does not appeal (!) and at 2:03.3, the pace suggests you were both going for it. I'm guessing about 1:55 for you and 2:10 for Carol? Awesome!
Mike - hope your head (and the rest of you!) ends up in a better place soon. You are normally pretty strong at these sprinty things.MPx wrote: ↑June 10th, 2019, 3:43 pm3/6 20x300 r1 for the CTC. Lindsay suggested 2k-3s was doable so I stupidly set off at 1:42. Only took the one rep to know I couldn't do that for another 19! Next few tried to keep sub 1:44 then sub 1:45. Mostly managed but one at 1:46 and one at 1:49.6 before a faster last which gave me a 1:43.8 avg. In Lindsay's formula that gives me a 1:47ish 2k pace which is probably more realistic in given my current malaise!
Sorry to take over the sub7 thread Mike - thanks for the interest. I've just made a comment about the 6:59 thing on the training thread - it's starting to irritate me a little but I guess at least I haven't slowed down in a year.MPx wrote: ↑June 15th, 2019, 6:22 pmYeah, I do much prefer the sprinty stuff Lindsay so really should have been more up for it. I'm beginning to have serious doubts about my "new" (this year) training regime where my base session is an 8k at 20 spm and keeping my HR below my UT1 top limit 144 - try for sub 140. What happens is that my heart rate creeps so I'm now used to and expect to slow down. Slowing down keeps my heart rate within bounds but I seem to be training in the expectation of slowing down and my head is keen to do that on any piece now whether restricted or not. Of course the idea was to build base aerobic capacity as I've always been duff at that - much better anaerobically. Its what's preached on here all of the time so I thought I was being a mug to ignore it. After 6 months with higher meterage than I've ever done before my performances are clearly getting much worse and I'm starting to wonder if its just not the best regime for me given the amount of meters I'm prepared to put in overall and the negative effect on my mental state/confidence. But six months isn't that long - I'd intended to give myself a year. If I can stand it I'll carry on for a while ...we'll see
Thanks for the interest and many congrats on the latest competition - indeed all of them this year. A consistent 6:59 2k is something of a dream at the mo so I'm very envious! I'll keep following what you do with interest.